Re: Current bullseye security and stability
Jorge P. de Morais Neto <[email protected]> Sat, 16 Jan 2021 13:10:25 -0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.user.testing |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Em [2021-01-14 qui 16:08:43+0100], MichaIng escreveu: > I can only agree, running some Bullseye systems as well since Buster was > released, not facing any relevant issues. > [...] Thank you Micha and lucas. I have then upgraded my notebook to bullseye and so far it has been pleasant indeed. > And as you mention "unstable"/sid: Do not use it if it's not for > testing (I mean help testing new package implementations on a test > system) or development reasons. It's easy to run into a dependency > mess or that suddenly large parts of the system are upgraded to sid > packages. It's a development playground, not meant for production > systems. It should be pretty fine to wait until a certain software > version has reached the "testing" (currently Bullseye) suite, where > dependency integrity and a basic testing by maintainers has been done > already. So you recommend avoiding sid even for specific package minor-version upgrades with security fixes? The Debian wiki says otherwise. See https://wiki.debian.org/DebianTesting#Best_practices_for_Testing_users I currently follow the Debian wiki advice. I carefully monitor the list of installed packages from unstable, to avoid unintended upgrades. Regards