Re: Does a bad /etc/fstab entry of a 'spare' drive prevent system booting?
David Wright <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon 25 May 2026 at 12:41:30 (+0100), Chris Green wrote:
> I run Debian 13 on a ThinkPad t470 laptop. It has been very reliable
> over the years but just recently a secondary drive (not used at all
> for boot) has become a bit flakey and now it won't boot at all.
>
> It gets to:-
>
> Cannot open access to cosole, the root account is locked
> See sulogin(8) man page for more details
>
> Press enter to continue
>
> Pressing enter gets one nowhere.
>
>
> I'm creating a new boot/installation USB stick so I can boot from USB
> and then edit the system's /etc/fstab to remove the faulty drive's
> mount.
>
> However it does seem a bit 'unfriendly' to make the system totally
> unbootable if a drive that isn't needed at all for the boot process
> can't be mounted by fstab.
IIRC, around the time of jessie, systemd's interaction with fstab
changed, but man fstab and the Debian wiki page haven't really
caught up. I'd look at https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Fstab
for a more comprehensive view.
(To be fair, man fstab does contain a disclaimer:
"This document describes handling of fstab by util-linux
and libmount. For systemd, read systemd documentation.
There are slight differences."
but no references.)
Cheers,
David.