Re: (slightly OT?) Disk usage of find

Marco Ippolito <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.user
Message-ID <akIs33iZQScSZUtv@leo>
On 2026-05-16, [email protected] wrote:
> I tend to avoid the use of find (1) because I never really "internalized" the syntax) and (2) on the assumption that it hits the disk "harder" than locate.
>
> I mean, updatedb runs once a day (on my systems) and I assume (I know) that its database is mostly cached somewhere, but I don't really know how it finds new files.
>
> Is there any validity to the idea that find is harder on disks (hits them more often / more widely) than locate?

When at my computer, I prefer to wait less.

I do not run performance-sensitive workloads around the time /usr/lib/systemd/plocate-updatedb.timer runs (i.e.: during the night), so I am trading that disk access, done when I don't notice it, for responsiveness.

For efficiency, you'd probably want to fine-tune indexing exclusion rules in /etc/updatedb.conf (avoiding work you won't use), and scheduling.

Marco Ippolito
[email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.