Re: Question about: Debian puts artificial intelligence to a vote; developers will decide how to accept AI-generated or assisted code

That is the great thing about Open Source, you can check the code 
yourself. No difference with code written by 'real' developers.

Op 21/08/2026 om 16:00 schreef [email protected]:
> On Fri, 21 Aug 2026, Franco Martelli wrote:
>
>> On 21/08/26 at 09:27, Wlad Andrianoff wrote:
>>> Personally, I disagree and believe that AI should not be used. AI code
>>> should not be created for Debian, and even less so for Linux operating
>>> systems. Debian has managed to endure thanks to a large and active
>>> global community that develops its system without external intervention,
>>> especially from AI. I don't think it's appropriate to use artificial
>>> intelligence (AI) to create code for Debian or GNU/Linux systems, as it
>>> would undermine their essence of community collaboration and manual
>>> work. Debian should continue as it has been, operating as a community
>>> and leveraging the best of each individual, without resorting to machines.
>> You're late, the Linux kernel already accept patches from AI generated
>> codes ¹ in addiction L. Torwalds in a recent post spotted that Linux it
>> is *not* an OS against AI, so I don't see why The Debian Project
>> shouldn't do the same.
>>
>> By the way your post doesn't seem a question as mentioned in the
>> Subject, so what is the question?
>>
>> ¹https://www.phoronix.com/news/HP-X-Flip-14-Linux-Audio
>>
>> --
>> Franco Martelli
>>
> maybe a little off topic but
> it's been well publicized that ai is used to write malicious code
> how can we find an os that we trust
>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

wnsEABYIACMWIQQ2fLNeaWoD+Znr3Zun9oi85XrAzQUCaohksQUDAAAAAAAKCRCn9oi85XrAzTa8
AQDafKzROk4K0Ui+aWS+i59KPVHr3AhzGEfvflatpUL/SQD+Li66sYrmfuRGIOXK3LIK43I3T9LZ
pD4y9TjhkMDg2A4=
=Dzui
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----