Re: Question about: Debian puts artificial intelligence to a vote; developers will decide how to accept AI-generated or assisted code

On 2026-08-21 at 14:43, Jean-Christophe wrote:

> Here is a respectful and articulate response in English:

Especially given the inclusion of that line, this reads very strongly as
if it were written by a LLM, AKA "generative AI".

Given that the message you're responding to explicitly includes the
statement

>> I am not interested in conversing with machines

, it seems clear to me that sending a response which was generated by
such a machine is by definition not respectful.

You might still have a valid argument to justify using it in such a
case; that's a separate question. But labeling it as "respectful" while
disrespecting the expressed preferences of the one you're claiming to
respect seems problematic, to me.

-- 
   The Wanderer

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one
persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all
progress depends on the unreasonable man.         -- George Bernard Shaw

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=/MsK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----