Re: Question about: Debian puts a rtificial intelligence to a vote; developers will decide how to ac cept AI-generated or assisted code

Unfortunately, my English level doesn’t allow me to express myself correctly in that language.

Is it wrong to use a translator?

I don’t hide the fact that I use an LLM to express myself—it’s simply so I can share my perspective.

It’s not for me to decide.

That’s up to the Debian maintainers.

I use LLMs judiciously, but as usual, I upset people.

I’m used to it—it’s the story of my life.

Advise me on a distribution or on using an interpreter to express myself without causing offense, and I’ll leave.

Perhaps the Debian project has reached a point of no return and needs to split in two: those who refuse to engage with LLMs and those for whom it’s not an issue.

Respectfully.

Le 21 août 2026 18:52:23 UTC, The Wanderer <[email protected]> a écrit :
-> On 2026-08-21 at 14:43, Jean-Christophe wrote:
-> 
-> > Here is a respectful and articulate response in English:
-> 
-> Especially given the inclusion of that line, this reads very strongly as
-> if it were written by a LLM, AKA "generative AI".
-> 
-> Given that the message you're responding to explicitly includes the
-> statement
-> 
-> >> I am not interested in conversing with machines
-> 
-> , it seems clear to me that sending a response which was generated by
-> such a machine is by definition not respectful.
-> 
-> You might still have a valid argument to justify using it in such a
-> case; that's a separate question. But labeling it as "respectful" while
-> disrespecting the expressed preferences of the one you're claiming to
-> respect seems problematic, to me.
->