Re: Question about: Debian puts artificial intelligence to a vote; developers will decide how to accept AI-generated or assisted code

Charles Curley <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.user
Organization occasionally
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, 21 Aug 2026 14:52:23 -0400
The Wanderer <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 2026-08-21 at 14:43, Jean-Christophe wrote:
> 
> > Here is a respectful and articulate response in English:  
> 
> Especially given the inclusion of that line, this reads very strongly
> as if it were written by a LLM, AKA "generative AI".
> 
> Given that the message you're responding to explicitly includes the
> statement
> 
> >> I am not interested in conversing with machines  

This strikes me as a non-sequitur. Who is conversing with a machine?
Jean-Christophe may have used an AI. So what? He is solely reponsible
for the product, not the AI. You are conversing with him, not the AI.

If [email protected] takes offense at Jean-Christophe's reply, I'm sure
he can make an articulate and courteous response. I don't think he needs
you to do it for him.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.