Re: Question about: Debian puts artificial intelligence to a vote; developers will decide how to accept AI-generated or assisted code
Charles Curley <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | occasionally |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 21 Aug 2026 14:52:23 -0400 The Wanderer <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2026-08-21 at 14:43, Jean-Christophe wrote: > > > Here is a respectful and articulate response in English: > > Especially given the inclusion of that line, this reads very strongly > as if it were written by a LLM, AKA "generative AI". > > Given that the message you're responding to explicitly includes the > statement > > >> I am not interested in conversing with machines This strikes me as a non-sequitur. Who is conversing with a machine? Jean-Christophe may have used an AI. So what? He is solely reponsible for the product, not the AI. You are conversing with him, not the AI. If [email protected] takes offense at Jean-Christophe's reply, I'm sure he can make an articulate and courteous response. I don't think he needs you to do it for him.