Re: Where is the Wayland process?
Franco Martelli <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 27/08/26 at 17:14, Dan Ritter wrote: > Franco Martelli wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've installed Debian 13 on a VirtualBox VM with the KDE desktop. At GUI >> login sddm let me to choose if I want to start a Plasma session with X11 or >> Wayland. Choosing Wayland, what make me wondered is that a Wayland server >> process seems missing: >> >> 2166 tty1 Ssl+ 0:00 /usr/bin/startplasma-wayland >> 2184 ? Ssl 0:00 /usr/bin/kwin_wayland_wrapper --xwayland >> 2195 ? Rl 1:09 /usr/bin/kwin_wayland --wayland-fd 7 --socket >> wayland-0 --xwayland-fd 8 --xwayland-fd 9 --xwayland-display :1 > > > Wayland is weird. > > You're expecting a "wayland" process like the Xorg process that runs the > display, but Wayland is not implemented like that. Instead, the window > manager (technically, the compositor) is responsible for implementing > the Wayland protocols and acting as the display server. > > So, kwin_wayland is the KDE window manager and Wayland server. > > As a direct result, there is no universal upgrade that applies to all > Wayland desktop environments, and fixes in one (KDE Plasma) do not even > routinely get ported over to others (GNOME, wlroots...). > > -dsr- Ah! Thanks, so the first things that comes in my mind is that if I want to run another server session e.g. on VT8 I have to play with kwin_wayland to obtain something equivalent to: ~$ startx -- :1 vt8 -bpp 16 -nolisten tcp and looking for "wlroots" (apt search wlroots) I found many compositors so I can have a windows manager and then change the compositor (if I want) right? Kind regards,