Re: I PLEASE A NEW GOBOLINU-RELEASE!
Liam Proven <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.distributions.gobo.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMTenCEV9V9_rxTDq1tgJ9aL49b0JST05UDK3MWKa10uFnUSbw@mail.gmail.com> |
On 22 March 2013 21:40, Martín Cigorraga <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Viola Zoltán <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> First, I make it with SithWM, this is easy, SithWM has almost nothing >> dependencies. After SithWM maybe XFCE. But KDE and Gnome - not, I have >> nothing interest to this 2 bloatware. > > Bloatware!? Jesus... This is not a very unusual point of view. GNOME 3 is widely unpopular and Ubuntu's take on it, Unity, which is based on Gtk3 & GNOME 3 libraries but resembles Mac OS X, is also not widely admired. It has alienated people to the extent that the dead GNOME 2 project has been revived and forked, under the name Maté: http://mate-desktop.org/ GNOME 3 has also been modified to create the more traditional, Windows-like Cinnamon desktop from Linux Mint: http://cinnamon.linuxmint.com/ KDE 4, meanwhile, alienated a lot of people. (Myself included - I did not like KDE releases 2 or 3, but I could use them; KDE 4 is a mess of redundant options, but cannot do simple things like a working Windows-style vertical taskbar and the irritating "plasma" widgets are integral and cannot be turned off. (Even Windows 7 allows you to do this, and indeed, in recent sub-versions, they're off by default.) KDE 3 too was forked: http://www.trinitydesktop.org/ For now, I use Unity, but I each successive release grows more annoying. I am considering a switch myself. So, yes, I think it is fair to say that people don't like them and they are not very popular, partly due to size and complexity. -- Liam Proven • Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile Email: [email protected] • GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven MSN: [email protected] • Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 • Cell: +44 7939-087884