Re: The objectroot FHS
Sepero <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.distributions.gobo.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMzGP8yoH9ATuAuYuvBUdneyZ-oSuXMAHyusszYXoefuSjzAcw@mail.gmail.com> |
"what really separates a user, a group and a vendor org? There's not really a hell of lot of difference between them." Good point. I think Benjamin also makes a good point. One vendor may have several packages. I'm not really convinced that vendor even needs a directory? The Gobo layout of /programs/program-name/ seems much more direct/useful. So that thought brings into question the name /org/ (organization). Is there a problem of organizations releasing software with the same software title? That's the only reason why I would think organization directory would be necessary. When considering 3rd party software, perhaps it is necessary... hmmm. Also you've mentioned the Conary package system. It's been a long time since I explored it, but I remember it being a very intelligent packaging system. With 0install, I believe its use is not intended to be a default package manager. I believe most packages use static library linking, which can be really bad system performance. I agree that hashes are powerful. You'll get no argument there. My point was only like you said, they are a big eye sore. So long as that is taken into account, I agree the best decision should be made either way. _______________________________________________ gobolinux-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-users