Re: Systemd

I'm not a dev, but I certainly see how SystemD conflicts with the UNIX philosophy. I wonder if something like uselessd would be a viable compromise: http://uselessd.darknedgy.net/

On November 26, 2014 10:25:21 AM EST, "Lucas C. Villa Real" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:16 AM, Zbigniew <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>> There is much talk lately about systemd. Two example voices:
>>
>> - why? http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/the-biggest-myths.html - from
>> systemd creator
>> - why not?
>>
>http://wizardofbits.tumblr.com/post/45232318557/systemd-more-like-shit-stemd
>>
>> I'm wondering, what is Gobo-devs opinion about systemd?
>> --
>> Zbigniew
>> _______________________________________________
>> gobolinux-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-users
>>
>
>Greetings,
>
>Speaking for myself, I do not like the complexity path that Linux took
>in
>the recent years. Things have become very hard to manage and even more
>difficult to debug. That includes software like PolicyKit, notification
>daemons and systemd.
>
>Thankfully there is no strong dependency from core applications on
>systemd
>nowadays (that is, it is possible to have a full X11-based desktop up
>and
>running without it). I have no personal feelings about systemd as long
>as
>things are kept that way -- distros who like it are free to ship it,
>and
>those who don't can move on with their alternative boot process.
>GoboLinux'
>BootScripts are simple enough to understand and debug and, frankly, I
>hardly reboot my machines nor need to quickly boot Linux-based VMs on a
>daily basis -- therefore the subject has never been a concern for me.
>
>Cheers,
>Lucas
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>gobolinux-users mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-users