Re: ...best place to ask questions and to get help?
Mark Filipak <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.distributions.gobo.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 03/27/2015 03:25 PM, Sergio Tortosa Benedito wrote: > Oh, I did the wrong translation sorry (confused upset as angry), > however, I wouldn't call it being upset, rather I would not like this to > be a flame list. > When I meant too harsh I meant this: > "You are an Enlightenment fanboy. I'm not going to argue with you." > Maybe I'm too soft, but for me that's being harsh. > > --Sergio Thank you, Sergio. I sent you a private message. I didn't see your response. Yes, "upset" means "disturbed", "troubled", not "angry" (though upset feelings can lead to anger). For example, if you saw a dog injured, you might become upset. Then, if you discovered that the injury was caused by someone's negligence, you might become angry. I have sensed that some people here are emotionally tied to Enlightenment. To me, Enlightenment is an example of a trend in user interfaces that is making computers harder to use. Pop-ups are especially irritating because the operation of the OS becomes halting -- ummm... time delays (understand?) -- and rather than smoothly moving the mouse across the desktop, I have to stop while the pop-up delays so that when it goes away I can then see what's beneath it. My opinion is that time spent developing Enlightenment is mis-spent. Enlightenment appears not to add anything to make running a computer easier or faster. It appears to simply be special effects. I would like to be involved with adding real, desired functionality that doesn't exist now. I listed some of that functionality. Perhaps it's not welcome, or perhaps some people think I haven't earned the right to make such proposals. What do you think? Ciao - Mark. > El 27/3/2015 20:15, "Mark Filipak" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> escribió: > > On 03/27/2015 02:22 PM, Sergio Tortosa Benedito wrote: > > Indeed, nothing really, I just felt it was too harsh, again you are on > > your right to dislike or like what you want. > > Nothing has upset you? ...You seem upset. "it was too harsh". What is > "it"? What was too harsh? > > > El 27/3/2015 19:05, "Mark Filipak" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> > escribió: > > > > On 03/27/2015 01:14 PM, Sergio Tortosa Benedito wrote: > > > Wow, that's quite mean you know, among other things peoe tend to get > > > angry when they are defined. > > > > What has upset you? > > > > > However, you are on your right to hate/dislike it. Indeed I love e from > > > a technical view, the UI is just... well... made by developers. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > gobolinux-users mailing list > > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-users > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > gobolinux-users mailing list > > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-users > > > _______________________________________________ > gobolinux-users mailing list > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > gobolinux-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-users >