Re: Interesting and maybe relevant article
Sergio Tortosa Benedito <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.distributions.gobo.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAPiRi8PYPZurYzQ_V38BbyBPZoscfKyhn=+GqYs928HM9CCfjw@mail.gmail.com> |
Knneth Marken wrote: >Frankly i find containers on the desktop to be one of two things: >Cloud "devs" that think they have found the hammer to fix all "nails". >DE devs (hello Gnome) that think that users must be protected from themselves, or else they will soil the devs pristine ivory tower. From what I have readed I feel like containers are pretty much "standard" sandboxes with some extra features, so I'll answer as if it was sandboxing. Sandboxing is nice, I think like that and I'm no cloud man (my only server is one running a personal minecraft server), and I want sandbox for my own computer so it's no like I'm going to soil my pristine ivory tower. Here's a secret, bugs exist, both in the application itself and the background code (libraries, kernel...) so sandboxing is just limiting applications capabilities to just what they need (something which seems pretty reasonable), in order to stop both bugs and attacks from harming one's computer. If you think untrusted applications are the only way to get atracked through an application look from some info, big software tends to have bugs: java, adobe reader, and even the kernel itself (I remember also a linux PDF readers had problems, I think it was EOG) have had bugs which let people attack you. El 22/4/2015 21:53, "Trans" <[email protected]> wrote: > > I can understand maybe running the browser in a container, since that is likely to to be the mostly likely source of security issues. But then again, if it ever became really popular I'm sure hacker would find a way around that too. > > Or am I missing the point of containers? Well, containers themselves I think are more for cloud, bug standard sandboxing is useful in desktop, I could repeat much lf what I said above, the point it's not only protecting you from untrusted applications, but also from bugs in trusted ones. Truth be told (as of today and in Linux) I think the mostly likely source is software installation downloaded from internet, packages which promise to solve X bug with Y application/driver, or any sort of package difficult to trust just because the people around them are small. --Sergio _______________________________________________ gobolinux-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-users