Re: Gobolinux 016 Final question

On 24 November 2016 at 12:45, Liam Proven <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 24 November 2016 at 15:18, Hugo Barrocas <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hisham, that 'brave answer' could even be stated in the main Gobo webpage :)
>>
>> It would allow users to have a much clearer perpective of what the Gobo way
>> is intended, and so it would help avoid much of the hassle that happened in
>> previous releases.
>>
>> If users know what they are getting into from the start, they will have less
>> reasons to complain about it later on :)

I'm planning some updates for the GoboLinux website timed with the 016
release. That is indeed a good idea, and I'll try to add some of that
with a hopefully nicer phrasing in there.

Also: I didn't get Hugo's email. It seems I'm getting hiccups on the
mailing list, but I'm not sure if it's a misbehaving spam filter on my
end (that's happened before and even ate up some of Lucas's
emails...).

-- Hisham
_______________________________________________
gobolinux-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-users