Re: Server installation over the network
Anshuman Aggarwal <[email protected]> Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:47:39 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.distributions.gobo.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAK-d5da5m2j2P-TV07mcbEVL2vZhrwznzgq_vxnNzX4FHmWM7Q@mail.gmail.com> |
On 12 April 2017 at 10:34, Hisham <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12 April 2017 at 01:57, Anshuman Aggarwal > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 10 April 2017 at 23:35, Lucas C. Villa Real <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Anshuman Aggarwal >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> I have started pruning the PackageNames.txt file for a server install. >>>> Can we split this file into a say ServerPackageNames.txt and append >>>> the GUIPackageNames.txt and the ISO build script can be given an >>>> option to make either one? This will allow us to keep server and gui >>>> ISO builds around without double maintenance? >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Anshuman >>>> >>> >>> To be fair, I wouldn't like to touch the installer right now. We're going to >>> have a complete rewrite of it very soon, now that our abstraction toolkit >>> (AbsTk) library has been ported to Lua. We'll likely want to go with a >>> different approach to the installation of remote packages instead of the >>> traditional "network install", too. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Lucas >>> >> >> I suggest that the new installer have multiple installation options >> for packages like minimal, server or at least GUI/No GUI >> (headless/virtual vs desktop/laptop use cases). > > One very important reason we don't advertise Gobo as a server OS is > because we do not publish security patches with the necessary speed > required by a server OS running always-connected network services. I > do not recommend running Gobo as a server, and as a matter of fact, as > of 016.01, I recommend against it. > > If one wants to install it on a server one is free to do so, but one > would have to track security updates for all installed packages by > hand and that is really risky business. > > -- Hisham That is a very good point that got overlooked. Although in todays day of high speed internet available on even desktop/laptops/mobiles they are quite vulnerable but mostly they are behind a NAT router which acts as a firewall. However if one has a good linux firewall (say shorewall) installed, then only the linux kernel, the firewall and other open services need to be kept up to date right? That may be doable for a SOHO server, IMHO :-) If we are worried about an out of date application which is making an outgoing connection then all the Gobo desktops would be vulnerable (assuming you spend an 8 hour day working on it)? > _______________________________________________ > gobolinux-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-users _______________________________________________ gobolinux-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-users