Re: Server installation over the network

Anshuman Aggarwal <[email protected]> Wed, 12 Apr 2017 15:47:39 +0530
Newsgroups gmane.linux.distributions.gobo.general
Message-ID <CAK-d5da5m2j2P-TV07mcbEVL2vZhrwznzgq_vxnNzX4FHmWM7Q@mail.gmail.com>
On 12 April 2017 at 10:34, Hisham <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 12 April 2017 at 01:57, Anshuman Aggarwal
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 10 April 2017 at 23:35, Lucas C. Villa Real <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Anshuman Aggarwal
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I have started pruning the PackageNames.txt file for a server install.
>>>> Can we split this file into a say ServerPackageNames.txt and append
>>>> the GUIPackageNames.txt and the ISO build script can be given an
>>>> option to make either one? This will allow us to keep server and gui
>>>> ISO builds around without double maintenance?
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Anshuman
>>>>
>>>
>>> To be fair, I wouldn't like to touch the installer right now. We're going to
>>> have a complete rewrite of it very soon, now that our abstraction toolkit
>>> (AbsTk) library has been ported to Lua. We'll likely want to go with a
>>> different approach to the installation of remote packages instead of the
>>> traditional "network install", too.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Lucas
>>>
>>
>> I suggest that the new installer have multiple installation options
>> for packages like minimal, server or at least GUI/No GUI
>> (headless/virtual vs desktop/laptop use cases).
>
> One very important reason we don't advertise Gobo as a server OS is
> because we do not publish security patches with the necessary speed
> required by a server OS running always-connected network services. I
> do not recommend running Gobo as a server, and as a matter of fact, as
> of 016.01, I recommend against it.
>
> If one wants to install it on a server one is free to do so, but one
> would have to track security updates for all installed packages by
> hand and that is really risky business.
>
> -- Hisham

That is a very good point that got overlooked. Although in todays day
of high speed internet available on even desktop/laptops/mobiles they
are quite vulnerable but mostly they are behind a NAT router which
acts as a firewall.

However if one has a good linux firewall (say shorewall) installed,
then only the linux kernel, the firewall and other open services need
to be kept up to date right? That may be doable for a SOHO server,
IMHO :-)

If we are worried about an out of date application which is making an
outgoing connection then all the Gobo desktops would be vulnerable
(assuming you spend an 8 hour day working on it)?

> _______________________________________________
> gobolinux-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-users
_______________________________________________
gobolinux-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-users