Re: Removing some targets

On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 02:53:35PM +0100, Benjamin Schieder wrote:
> Hi list.
Hi to list writer,

> I think we can remove the following targets:
> - desktop
agreed.

>   superseded by crystal
> - dietlibc
>   unmaintained and AFAICS royally broken
agreed. When I watched esden once working on that target, fixing all
packages by copying glibc headers over, I wondered if it makes sense
anyway.

> Targets I'm not sure about
> - server
>   desktop with different package selection
Here I think we should do something similar to the crystal. We should
agree to offer a server target featuring one mta (exim), one http server
(apache), one ftp server (vsftp) and so on. And no X imho.

> - epiam
>   Andreas? Seems this was last done with 2.4.24. What the state on this?
I think I will either update it or merge it's changes into the
respective packages if it doesn't cause problems.

> The reason I think we can/should do this is to unclutter the target selection
> a bit and remove stuff that is obviously broken.
Nice try :)

Ciao

Andreas

_______________________________________________
rock-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.rocklinux.net/mailman/listinfo/rock-devel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCHI9x2A9/vRi9PS4RAgfpAJ4lPqrGFQWTIHL4zJxe66rAX4HuuQCdEofj
dvcGKaMXaFlyJ3cQhtfsrvk=
=tEkL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----