Re: Build errors and fixes

On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 10:43:14PM +0100, Andreas V. Meier wrote:
> Using it for 2.4 only shouldn't be that big problem, just check for
> linux24-source availability and use the /usr/src/linux-2.4.*-rock/ dir.

Oh god! please not!

If it is disabled for systems with no linux24, this is a decision which has
to be made at configure time - not when the package is built already.

I'd suggest that we always build a linux24-header and a linux26-header
package. They install theyr headers in /usr/include/linux24 and
/usr/include/linux26 respectively. The package with the "default headers"
is then symlinked to /usr/include.

For every package which requires linux24 or linux26 headers we simply pass
a -I$root/usr/include/linux24 (or -I$root/usr/include/linux26) using the
CC_WRAPPER.

What do you think?

yours,
 - clifford

-- 
+++>+>++++++[<+++++++>-]<..>++>++++++[<+++++>-]<.>>++++++[<+++++++++++>-]<.
>++>>++++[<++++[<+++++++>-]>-]<<.>+>>++++[<++++[<++++++>-]>-]<<.++++++++.<-
---.>---.<<<<-.>>>>---.<---.<<.<+..>.>>---.>>++++>>++++[<++++[<+++++++>-]>-
]<<..----.<<<--------.<<++++..>>>>>+++++++...<<<<<-.>>>>.<++++.---.>+++..<+
+++++.+++.>--.<<<<.>>>>---.<++.<<<+.>>>>+.++++.---.<----.>>--.<<<<<.>.<----
..>.>+++++++++.>>>>>>++++[<++++[<+++++>-]>-]<<.+++++.<<<<<<+.>.>.>-.--.+++.
>++++++.+++.-------.<++.<<<.>.>>>.>-.<--.<<<<++..>.<---..>>>>>>>++++++++++.
 
Unix is the answer, but only if you phrase the question very carefully.

_______________________________________________
rock-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.rocklinux.net/mailman/listinfo/rock-devel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQFCHvyhPNIEsfpKDdERAmTyAJ4pYifB9A7i/N1KZ+EqgmGjY50XzQCYwyWP
5hlRiQY8rmLT48jbi75yyA==
=miRp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----