Re: Re: [rock-sm] 2005030810203910534 fake msg does not compile, missing header files

hi,

On Tuesday 22 March 2005 21:16, Andreas V. Meier wrote:
> > you could try and test your patches ;-) in the reference target i just
> > finished 6 packages have failed, of which 4 are from the avm/ repository.
>
> all updates are built in my system.
that may not be optimal, as your running system's configuration my not catch 
all configurations, like a reference/generic build does.

> > btscanner: eek. doesn't like bluez-utils/libs update, it seems.
> that was you who updated it.
right, i'm not trying to find someone guilty here, just reporting errors you 
don't seem to have... i'll look into btscanner tomorrow, the adoption should 
be trivial.

> > ipw2100: missing hostap file
> Someone updated hostap and I didn't notice it. I downgraded it already
> once because of this. (ipw2100 is more important than the latest hostap
> version to me). So please und the update.
maybe the ipw2100 driver can be get to work with the new hostap version?

> > ksendfax: complains about missing header files
> >  myscandialog.cpp:23:24: scanparams.h: No such file or directory
> >  myscandialog.cpp:24:25: devselector.h: No such file or directory
> >  myscandialog.cpp:25:24: img_canvas.h: No such file or directory
> >  myscandialog.cpp:26:23: previewer.h: No such file or directory
> Seems you have sane installed which I haven't on my notebook.
> Passing -I/opt/kde3/include should help this one.
> Or build without sane. Like crystal is.
building without sane is not an option. the rule is, a package has to pass a 
full reference build to be accepted. can you test the -I thing?

> > p3nfs: tries to get ahold of a serial device during build
> Shall I borrow you one?
there are only *very* few /dev entries in the chroot. serial devices are not 
among them. those tests won't work.

> You see, of those 4 errors in my repo is one caused by you, 1 by your
> poor build hardware, one by your package selection.
again, i'm not looking for anyone guilty to point at or trying to piss you 
off, just asked for error reports...

> None of those errors occured on my system. And just giving a negative
> comment like "does not compile" is as helpful as a comment "sender has
> long nose".
you know what they say about people with long noses, don't you? ;-))
it's true, it wasn't helpful, but i was into other things (like the whole kde 
update), and didn't have the time to look into it (i still have no internet 
at home and thus are now still at work...). again, the rule for a patch to be 
applied is that it has to pass a stage-5 reference build. if you don't do 
those, you won't see the errors, true, but unfortunately that doesn't make 
them go away ;)

fake