Re: 2.0-stable versus 2.1/trunk

Hi,

Am Montag, 7. März 2005 13:08 schrieb Clifford Wolf:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 03:00:13PM +0100, Tobias Hintze wrote:
> > besides that i think that the gap between 2.0-stable and 2.1 is too big
> > for stabilizing by merging from 2.1 to 2.0 in one step. my idea is to
> > split this into more steps. IMHO these steps should be called
> > 2.{2,4,6,8}-stable.
> >
> > that would imply that we should rename the current trunk from 2.1 to
> > something like 2.99, 3.x-dev, ...
>
> <RFC>
>
> what about simply renaming trunk to "TRUNK" - without any version number.
> We can use the rev. number if we refer to any special trunk status..
>
> </RFC>

Since this has been done now, could you please update the mirrors.cgi so trunk 
users are able to download the mirror list again?
Which is especially important since cksum changes are no longer supportet.

Ciao

Andreas

_______________________________________________
rock-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.rocklinux.net/mailman/listinfo/rock-devel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCXRRb2A9/vRi9PS4RAvWDAKCcPyPurxEx/KYzdz4I8+AaQsOkGACeJ9pP
f+ObLOjjwrGcf/i8OMdMJBw=
=XYMV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----