Re: Future of devfs in ROCK

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Stefan Fiedler wrote:
> I'd rather like to have support for both devfs and udev, with udev being the 
> default for 2.6 kernels.

The problem is that there is no more devfs starting with 2.6.14. There would be
lots and lots of special cases for that. Of course, we can just leave it as it
is now until the 2.4 series doesn't matter anymore, but until then we'll have it
sit there and bitrot away.

Greetings,
	Benjamin
- --
< blindcoder> I still say Violist didn't get it :P
< billnye> I say we have no evidence of it
< blindcoder> evidence is irrelevant
< blindcoder> it's rumors and believing that make truth
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDIyeI7Wabow2Um2YRAs+AAJwIkTRYeRwZ6AqauuJD1boB0Qlx1ACeJg6o
aE1dx8vMdBAyn/Eu3O1Qrvw=
=cQaB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----