Re: [rock-sm] 2006012319202122760 stf new
Stefan Fiedler <[email protected]> Mon, 23 Jan 2006 22:59:06 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.distributions.rock.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Montag 23 Januar 2006 19:40 schrieben Sie: > - gpg control packet > > [email protected] wrote: > > Open Patch: 2006012319202122760 [by stf] + > > stf > > > > Stefan Fiedler: > > mount tmpfs on /dev/shm instead of ramfs; > > with the Ati proprietary driver, 3D applications will be very > > slow if ramfs is mounted on /dev/shm > > What's the difference between the two? > > Greetings, > Benjamin I don't really know... 2.4 and 2.6 kernels have a config option for each. I'm using the Ati proprietary driver and if tmpfs is not mounted on /dev/shm, 3D apps like armyops or fgl_glxgears (a special glx_gears contained in the Ati driver download) show errors like: FGLTexMgr: open of shared memory object failed (Function not implemented) __FGLTexMgrCreateObject: __FGLTexMgrSHMmalloc failed!!! fglX11AllocateManagedSurface: __FGLTexMgrCreateObject failed!! and either run extremely slow (fgl_glxgears) or crash (armyops). The "normal" glx_gears is however not affected by this. With best regards, Stefan Fiedler