Re: removal of submaster

Hi,

Andreas V. Meier wrote:
>  2. git (blindcoder?)
>  [add other suggestions here]
> 

Is git compatible with our patch process? I don't know exactly how much
git is optimised für the kernel development process, but I also have
sensed our development process simliar to the kernel one, but I don't
know it really. If this feeling is true, git would be a possible
replacement.

But I think we also have to think about why so much patches are in
submaster. As I know in the past not only Clifford can add patches to
trunk, how this is now regualted I don't know. So there are more people
and teh question must be "why no one have time for doing this work? Is
this process to time-intensitive? How it can be optimised (perhaps with
a submaster replacement)? Do we need new trunk committers?"

Statements heavily pleased.

Cheers,
Michael

P.S.: Consider me as back in the team :-)