Re: ROCK Linux (this space intentionally left blank) Release Candidate 2

Am Donnerstag, 13. Juli 2006 21:20 schrieb Thomas "fake" Jakobi:
> hi rockers,
...
> > I'm currently undecided on version numbering, and I'd be pretty happy
> > with both a major.minor and a revision based scheme. But I think we
> > should keep in mind that major.minor schemes are often used to convey
> > additional information (such as binary compatibility), so if a numbering
> > scheme doesn't have a special meaning, it could be discarded altogether
> > to avoid confusion, imo.
>
> how about we just call it ROCK Linux 3 ? There are lost of numbers, and if
> we only use major numbers, we can't suggest any compatibility. This would
> leave us the option to do major.minor releases if we want (and if manpower
> increases).
>
> what do you think?

Sounds like a good idea. I'm all for it. :)

Stefan Fiedler

>
> fake
>
-- 
There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and 
ammo. Please use in that order.
  Ed Howdershelt (Author)