Re: group name: audio vs. sound

--===============1654585344==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AhhlLboLdkugWU4S"
Content-Disposition: inline


--AhhlLboLdkugWU4S
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 23.06.2007 14:43:25, Clifford Wolf wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> richt now we have two /etc/group entries with the same group id: audio and
> sound. This is because some packages assume the one and other packages
> assume the other name. I'd like to kick one of the both names and would
> like to know which one.
>=20
> Those of you with easy access to installations of other distributions:
> which name is used in what distribution?
>=20
> I have checked already LSB but they don't cover the topic..

IIRC Debian uses the one and SuSE the other. Personally, I'd vote for audio.
Audio would also cover microphones while sound is IMO only output.


Greetings,
	Benjamin
--=20
Benjamin 'blindCoder' Schieder
Registered Linux User #289529: http://counter.li.org
finger blindcoder-1k+CIuW/[email protected] | gpg --import
--=20
/lusr/bin/brain: received signal: SIGIDIOT

--AhhlLboLdkugWU4S
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGfRiVAsME5O4xgqgRAhRhAJ9hVClHM6FbykJceGU7vbGrDSVPjQCfWJ8H
sxrrWD0GLXJtb26JAmYuFyk=
=RdBR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--AhhlLboLdkugWU4S--

--===============1654585344==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
rock-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.rocklinux.net/mailman/listinfo/rock-devel

--===============1654585344==--