Re: Distributions vs kernel development
Martin Schlemmer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.distributions.rock.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 10:22, Rene Rebe wrote: > Hi, > > On: Mon, 24 May 2004 21:17:21 +0200, > Martin Schlemmer <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, 2004-05-09 at 11:13, Rene Rebe wrote: > > > > > But the last time I took a look not even an installer or such. + > > > Gentoo has no support for custom modifications not even thinking about > > > a way to group such custom modifications / build configuration into a > > > well defined way to form a distribution. + ROCK Linux has a real > > > sandbox build environment, not this optimization via CFLAGS, and so on > > > Gentoo wannabe. > > > > > > > Weird .. last time I checked, Gentoo sandbox was originally derived from > > ROCK Linux's sandbox wrapper .... > > Interesting ,) I did not know Gentoo copied ROCK Linux code, too. Yeah, well, started out that way, as G. Bevin who wrote it at the time, came from ROCK Linux (user I think). I do not think it resembles it much, if at all anymore though, and I know some additions have been added that you guys might think about, like also hooking execve (meaning subsequent bash's will still have LD_PRELOAD=sandboxlib in env, and if make/whatever sets LD_PRELOAD, the wrapper will add the sandboxlib back, etc), and one or two others I think. Regards, -- Martin Schlemmer
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBAs4gIqburzKaJYLYRAsREAJ9j0/P5nt6sz8pm1F86uURjKtyxiQCbBsvF hNm80qgCS54DjvJIn09mBxo= =7RQa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----