Re: [rock-user] ROCK's visibility could be increased with little effort

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> However, my point is
> 
> *not* actually "let's migrate to LQ.org",
> 
> *but* "let's think about how we can attract people (users!) to ROCK".
> 
> 
> It seems, however, that many ROCK users are ROCK developers, too. And I 
> accept that for developers LQ.org is not an ideal solution. But: Why 
> aren't there more *users* that are no developers?

Sorry if I wrote that a bit wrong, but that's exactly how I understood you.
But for now, there is the problem: who does the initial caretaking?
I already volunteered for that, but I'll be offline for three weeks starting
Sunday, that's why I would contact Jeremy about setting up a ROCK Forum on
LQ.org after that.
If you or someone else wants to do that, then by all means: go ahead!

I just really want to avoid a situation that might get the impression that ROCK
folks are a closed circle of enlightened gurus not sharing their wisdom with
others. I'm not sure if I can always do that, but I'll at least try.

So, to sum it up:
The idea _is_ good and I _want_ to realize it.

If you have other ideas, just post them here and don't be discouraged if they
are flamed to hell and back or remain unanswered. ROCK _is_ short on manpower.


Greetings,
	Benjamin
- --
Benjamin 'blindCoder' Schieder
Registered Linux User #289529: http://counter.li.org
finger blindcoder-1k+CIuW/[email protected] | gpg --import
- --
/lusr/bin/brain: received signal: SIGIDIOT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC9FLI7Wabow2Um2YRAkuIAJwLSkBVGTlKYufoeHhiTiuUzxcbewCfUYrY
dj0QT3deymI8ulUowuxEQxI=
=ZwhY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----