Re: [rock-user] web site: Source Trees->Rock Linux 2.1

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.linux.distributions.rock.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004, Rene Rebe wrote:

> We should do reference builds for both 2.0 and 2.1 I think. Clifford?

Yes. I'm doing reference builds without stage 9 1-2 times a week for
testing sm patches before applying them. The last result was:

Error logs from ref0414-2.1.0-DEV-x86-reference-expert:

 [5]   1 base/electricfence              [5]   1 base/alsa-driver
 [5]   1 rene/lm_sensors                 [5]   0 gnome24/hotapplet
 [5]   0 alessandro/busybox              [5]   0 kasc/openal
 [5]   0 sirkull/slidentd                [5]   0 esden/tetradraw
 [5]   0 mnemoc/mono-debugger            [5]   0 jsaw/scribus
 [5]   0 nikolaus/mgt                    [5]   0 nikolaus/ocs
 [5]   1 rene/xine                       [5]   2 jsaw/sword
 [5]   0 jsaw/bibletime                  [5]   0 jsaw/gnomesword

1174 builds total, 1158 completed fine, 16 with errors.

I'm having on my todo to automatically push the results to the http
server. I'll implement this as soon as my current build is finished.

Some of the build errors listed above are already fixed in the journal I'm
testing right now. It would be great to have ref. builds with 0 errors in
one or two months..

> There are not yet 2.1 tarballs. The devel cycle just started ...

I'm not sure if 2.1 (devel tree) tarballs would be neccessary. The current
tree is available with subversion and rsync.

> We still need to discuss how we want to branch stable tree's in the
> future. I would vote to just branch the tree (branches/2.1-stable
> would be the next in this case - as done in *BSD and such) and
> stabilize and release it.

ack.

> Instead of the usual long development and stabilization phases.
> Unfinished or unstable stuff would be removed in the stabilization brach
> to have a final release within some months.

Also I'm very serious about avoiding major unstabalazition in the devel
tree. So branching stable trees should be much easier and faster in the
futrure.

yours,
 - clifford

-- 
| Clifford Wolf /-----=[ www.clifford.at ]==[ Tel: +43-699-10063494 ]=-\
|--------------/ diestartseite.at vocat.cc =[ Fax: +43-2235-42788-4 ]=-|
|-=[ EDEN Creations -- www.edenevents.at ]==[ IRC: www.freenode.net ]=-|
\==[ www.rocklinux.org ]===[ www.rocklinux.net ]===[ www.linbit.com ]==/

2B OR (NOT 2B) That is the question. The answer is FF.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.