Re: [PATCH net-next V7 4/4] devlink: Apply eswitch mode boot defaults

Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.documentation,gmane.linux.network,gmane.linux.drivers.rdma
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, 31 Jul 2026 16:52:25 +0300 Mark Bloch wrote:
> >> Maybe "after_init()" ? "in" sounds like we can release it multiple
> >> times but I think the idea is that it's the final, single "release 
> >> into the wild" unlock.  
> > 
> > ack  
> 
> Just to make sure I understand the proposal.
> 
> AFAIU devl_unlock_after_init() can be used in one of two ways:
> 
> Convert all devlink drivers to use it for the final unlock, including
> drivers which don't support eswitch mode setting.
> 
> That's a lot of churn for the few drivers which need this.
> We'd also need to make sure existing drivers are converted and new
> drivers use the right helper.

We can add a WARN_ON(!registered) to the normal unlock and it will
be impossible to miss the use of the wrong one?

> Convert only drivers which support eswitch mode setting.
> 
> Then applying the default becomes driver opt-in, which AFAIU we were
> trying to avoid. For this feature it also looks very similar to the
> explicit apply API Jiri objected to.

Well, it would be a change to the init flow into which more things
can be hooked. We could also make it a separate "driver ready" call,
I guess, instead of packing it with the unlock. The point is that it's
not a eswitch-mode dedicated callback that's easy to miss in a driver.

> Which one do you have in mind?
> 
> I don't think either option is great. Wouldn't it be simpler to queue
> work from devl_register(), as before? That keeps the logic out of
> devl_unlock() and doesn't require driver opt-in.

Having to edit the drivers is not a concern to me. That said, I do agree
that the API is somewhat awkward. It's a compromise. IDK.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.