Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Add support for compat CPU capabilities for KVM on PowerNV
Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.ppc64.devel,gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.documentation |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Amit Machhiwal <[email protected]> writes: > Currently, when booting a compatibility-mode KVM guest (L1) on a PowerNV > hypervisor (L0), the guest runs with the expected processor > compatibility level. However, when booting a nested KVM guest (L2) > inside the L1, QEMU derives the CPU model from the raw host PVR and > attempts to run the nested guest at that level, instead of honoring the > compatibility mode of the L1. > > Extend host CPU compatibility capability reporting to support nested > virtualization on PowerNV systems (PAPR nested API v1). > > For nested API v2 (PowerVM), compatibility capabilities are served from > the cached nested_capabilities value (populated at module init via > kvmhv_nested_init() using the H_GUEST_GET_CAPABILITIES hcall). This > information is not available on PowerNV systems. > > For nested API v1, derive the compatibility capabilities from the L1 > guest by reading the "cpu-version" property from the device tree, which > reflects the effective (logical) processor compatibility level. Map this > value to the corresponding compatibility capability bitmap using > KVM-specific constants. > > The mapping is cumulative: a system running at a given compatibility > level is assumed to also support older generations down the supported > chain. Note that unlike KVM on PowerVM (nested API v2), KVM on PowerNV > currently does not strictly enforce older generation compatibility modes > for nested guests - the reported capabilities reflect what the host CPU > can present, not what the hypervisor independently validates. > > Introduce a helper kvmppc_map_compat_capabilities() to translate CPU > version values into KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAP bits using a fallthrough switch, > and integrate it into kvmppc_get_compat_caps(). The implementation > applies masking to ensure only supported processor modes are exposed. > > This allows userspace to query host CPU compatibility modes on both > KVM on PowerVM and on PowerNV platforms via the KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS > ioctl. > > Suggested-by: Vaibhav Jain <[email protected]> > Tested-by: Gautam Menghani <[email protected]> > Reviewed-by: Gautam Menghani <[email protected]> > Tested-by: Anushree Mathur <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Amit Machhiwal <[email protected]> > --- > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c > index 152cd08a5b38..4d0307f55e06 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c > @@ -6523,20 +6523,56 @@ static bool kvmppc_hash_v3_possible(void) > return true; > } > > +static int kvmppc_map_compat_capabilities(u32 cpu_version, > + unsigned long *capabilities) > +{ > + switch (cpu_version) { > + case PVR_ARCH_31_P11: > + *capabilities |= KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAP_POWER11; > + fallthrough; > + case PVR_ARCH_31: > + *capabilities |= KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAP_POWER10; > + fallthrough; > + case PVR_ARCH_300: > + *capabilities |= KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAP_POWER9; > + break; > + default: > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > > static int kvmppc_get_compat_caps(struct kvm_ppc_compat_caps *host_caps) > { > + struct device_node *np; > unsigned long capabilities = 0; > long rc = -EINVAL; > + u32 cpu_version = 0; > > if (kvmhv_on_pseries()) { > if (kvmhv_is_nestedv2()) { > WARN_ON_ONCE(!nested_capabilities); > capabilities = nested_capabilities; > rc = 0; > + } else { > + for_each_node_by_type(np, "cpu") { > + if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "cpu-version", > + &cpu_version)) { > + of_node_put(np); > + break; > + } > + } What happens when we don't have "cpu-version" DT property? Check this commit 5a61ef74f269f2 ("powerpc/64s: Support new device tree binding for discovering CPU features") And also why do we need to parse the DT properties again? Shouldn't we check something like this? if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_P11_PVR)) capabilities |= KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAP_POWER11; if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31)) capabilities |= KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAP_POWER10; if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300)) capabilities |= KVM_PPC_COMPAT_CAP_POWER9; -ritesh > + if (!cpu_version) > + return -EINVAL; > + rc = kvmppc_map_compat_capabilities(cpu_version, > + &capabilities); > } > } > > + if (rc < 0) > + return rc; > + > host_caps->compat_capabilities = capabilities & KVM_PPC_COMPAT_BITMASK; > > return rc; > -- > 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)