RE: WATCHDOG timeout
"Afzal, Naeem M" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.drivers.eepro100.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > What driver version? > What is the detection message? eepro100.c:v1.09j-t 9/29/99 Donald Becker http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/eepro100.html eepro100.c: $Revision: 1.5.2.1 $ 2000/11/17 Modified by Andrey V. Savochkin <[email protected]> and others <4>eth0: Invalid EEPROM checksum 0x552b, check settings before activating this device! <6>eth0: Intel Corp. 82559ER (#2), 00:90:D7:00:10:20, IRQ 15. <6> Board assembly 729757-005, Physical connectors present: RJ45 <6> Primary interface chip i82555 PHY #1. <6> General self-test: passed. <6> Serial sub-system self-test: passed. <6> Internal registers self-test: passed. <6> ROM checksum self-test: passed (0xdbd8681d). > What does > eepro100-diag --force -a -ee > report while the problem is happening? > I compiled eepro100-diag.c for xscale and ran it, it failed at while trying to do if (iopl(3)<0) { perror("Nework adapter diagnosgtic: iopl()"); fprintf(stderr, "This program must be run as root.\n"); return 2; } ignored this part by #if 0, then I was able to run, but gave segment core. I was not running it while this problem was going on but it failed anyway. [email protected]:~# eepro100-diag --force -a -ee eepro100-diag.c:v2.08 4/17/2002 Donald Becker ([email protected]) http://www.scyld.com/diag/index.html Index #1: Found a Intel 82559ER EtherExpressPro/100+ adapter at 0x1ffff80. i82557 chip registers at 0x1ffff80: Segmentation fault > -- > Donald Becker [email protected] > Scyld Computing Corporation http://www.scyld.com > 410 Severn Ave. Suite 210 Second Generation > Beowulf Clusters > Annapolis MD 21403 410-990-9993 >