Re: sleep mode persistence

on Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 05:13:29PM -0400, Donald Becker wrote about Re: [eepro100] sleep mode persistence:

> In this case I suspect a problem a problem with card activation that may
> be solved by using my driver set and driver interface.

Using your driver (i.e.eepro100.c, pci-scan.{c,h}, kern_compat.h), I
get the following output:

# dmesg
Command ff was not immediately accepted, 10001 ticks!
Command 00ff was never accepted (201 polls)!
Command 0006 was not accepted after 20001 polls!  Current status ffffffff.
Command 00ff was never accepted (201 polls)!
Command 0060 was not accepted after 20001 polls!  Current status ffffffff.
Command ff was not immediately accepted, 10001 ticks!
Command 00ff was never accepted (201 polls)!
Command 0001 was not accepted after 20001 polls!  Current status ffffffff.
Command 00ff was never accepted (201 polls)!
Command 0070 was not accepted after 20001 polls!  Current status ffffffff.
Command ff was not immediately accepted, 10001 ticks!
Command ff was not immediately accepted, 10001 ticks!
Command ff was not immediately accepted, 10001 ticks!
Command ff was not immediately accepted, 10001 ticks!
Command ff was not immediately accepted, 10001 ticks!
Command ff was not immediately accepted, 10001 ticks!
Command ff was not immediately accepted, 10001 ticks!
eth1: The EEPro100 chip is missing!
Command ff was not immediately accepted, 10001 ticks!
Command ff was not immediately accepted, 10001 ticks!
eth1: The EEPro100 chip is missing!
eth1: The EEPro100 chip is missing!
eth1: The EEPro100 chip is missing!


-- 
[email protected]

Those who do not understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly."
-- Henry Spencer

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9m0gauSr0q5/7NwcRAgaBAJ9IOwd0EAZmmMZ8zb/VirSJpa4HbgCdGDZZ
uhX0ZGXhRl4MA0YN8HA++Tk=
=hm/4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----