Fixed wait_for_cmd timeout in Compaq Presario 2700T with Redhat Linux 7.3
Michael A Chase <[email protected]> Sun, 27 Oct 2002 17:40:51 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.drivers.eepro100.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
A couple weeks ago, I converted my Compaq Presario 2700T laptop from WinXP to dual boot with Redhat Linux 7.3. The network interface was almost unusable; it was continually hanging and I needed to disable and reenable eth0 every few seconds during data transfers in order to use it at all. The network interface for the 2700T is an built-in Intel EtherExpress Pro 100B which is reported in the system log to use i82557/i82558 with i82555 as the primary interface chip. Thd driver reports using IRQ 10 which is shared between PCI devices 02:08.0 and 02:05.0. The version messages from the driver provided by Redhat are: eepro100.c:v1.09j-t 9/29/99 Donald Becker http://www.scyld.com/network/eepro100.html eepro100.c: $Revision: 1.36 $ 2000/11/17 Modified by Andrey V. Savochkin <[email protected]> and others This driver appears to be much older than the latest driver at the Scyld website. Should I pester Redhat to use the newer one? Thank the gods for the URL in the version string. It lead me to this maillist and I found what appears to be the solution in the list archives. One of the messages mentioned a possible conflict between the Linux APM module and the eepro100. Since the APM module doesn't work with the Presario 2700T anyway I uninstalled the APM module and now my network is operating normally. The only changes I have made since the network was almost unusable because of wait_for_cmd timeouts are subscribing to this list and removing the APM module. I plan to remain subscribed for a couple weeks just in case that was the fix. -- Mac :}) ** I normally forward private questions to the appropriate mail list. ** Ask Smarter: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html Give a hobbit a fish and he eats fish for a day. Give a hobbit a ring and he eats fish for an age.