Re: --sendsms "Nickname <number>"
Raphaël <[email protected]> Tue, 12 May 2015 10:58:52 -0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.drivers.gnokii |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Since bash completion for gnokii was recently pushed in the bash-completion git tree, I'd like to bring up this question again: On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 02:29:09PM -0300, Raphaël Droz wrote: > Hi, > > I'd really like to have a possibility to pass a "destination" in a more > complex form than the current digit-only notation. > > That would open the door to completion of --sendsms using the output of > address managers. > > But for this to work, gnokii must accept an argument which would not > only be digit-only (ie: containing named "prefix") > Although Gnokii would ignore it, it's need for the completion-process to > work (since bash does not provide a distinction between what is > "suggested" and what is actually "completed" on the command line) > > In order to avoid complex parser-code and before writing an initial > patch, I'd like to know what are your thoughts about that? What format > should be accepted? > > I'm thinking about: > destination="whatever string <number>" > Thus, if the first char of arg is not part of [0123456789+] then expect > the destination to start after the first "<" > Other form are possible, like: > arg="whatever string: number" > arg="whatever string@number" > [it's up to the address manager to be flexible enough in order to output > the desired form] > > If --sendsms never allowed (and will never allow) sending emails > (although most cellphone allows that), then using the first form > (derived from the email notation) should be fine. > > > best regards -- GPG id: 0xF41572CEBD4218F4