Re: Can't WPA associate with latest ipw2200 driver (1.1.3)
"Jing Su" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.drivers.ipw2100.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, I've been experiencing the same things with my Netgear router running in BG mode, 54MB and with WPA. Here's the work-around that I've come up with that allows me to connect. First, you must have the following modules loaded. For some reason missing any of them prevents the thing from working. 80211_crypt_wep, 80211_crypt_ccmp, 80211_crypt_tkip Next, use iwconfig to set your card to managed mode. iwconfig eth1 mode managed then set the card to be unassociated with any access point iwconfig eth1 essid off then wpa supplicant should associate.and successfully handshake. wpa_supplicant -Dwext -i eth1 -c /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf -w -W Lucky for me, my own access point is the only one visible. Setting the essid value using iwconfig will prevent the wpa_supplicant from successfully handshaking. It MUST be set to off and allow wpa_supplicant to set the essid. Furthermore, setting any other options like RTS, power, rate, channel, etc seems to make the thing fail as well. If any of these fail, you must unload all of your modules, including all ipw2200 and all ieee80211 modules. Then restart the process again. It took me quite a bit of trial and error to get this combination to work. On my system any deviation from these steps will prevent it from succeeding. Also, disassociating from the AP will cause all subsequent reassociations to fail. If you diassociate from the AP you have to unload and reload the modules and repeat the process. I'm using: ipw2200 version 1.1.3 ieee80211 version 1.1.14 wpa_supplicant version 0.4.9 kernel 2.6.16.16 Let me know if this works for you. -Jing On 7/14/06, TNKS <[email protected]> wrote: > Zhu Yi wrote: > > > Did you enable QoS in your AP? If so, can you disable it and see if it > > works or not? > > It's possible that my Netgear router is old enough that it doesn't offer any > QoS functionality. I didn't see any such option on the router's HTTP-based > configuration interface. Let me know if there's something else on my > router you want me to check for. > > > Can you also try 1.1.3/1.1.13? It helps to identify it's a ieee80211 > > regression or ipw2200. > > Okay, so I tried 1.1.3/1.1.13, and I got a really bad kernel panic. I > didn't go through the labor of transcribing the stack trace of the panic, > but maybe you can reproduce it on your end. > > On the other hand, I'm now currently running 1.1.2/1.1.14, and it seems to > be running fine. So I think with respect to regression, the problem seems > to be with 1.1.3. Certainly a kernel panic definitely worth looking into > if there's no known reason that 1.1.3 shouldn't work with 1.1.13. > > Looking forward to you respond; happy to help out further. > > -Sukant > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > ipw2100-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipw2100-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV