Re: bad connection quality linux vs. windows (both ipw2100 & ipw2200)

Zhu Yi <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.drivers.ipw2100.devel
Organization Intel Corp.
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sun, 2006-07-30 at 22:40 +0200, Dr. Johannes Zellner wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I observed on different laptops with the 2100 and 2200 chipsets that if
> I move away the laptops from the access point the connection breaks down
> (or can't be established) on linux a lot sooner than on windows. With
> the same distance to the access point (~ 10 m, approximately 2 diagnoal
> stone walls) windows shows a "signal strength" of 50 - 60 % and the
> connection works quite well. OTOH with linux, same laptops, same
> distance to the access point, the connection sometimes can't be brought
> up, or if so, it breaks down again if moving the laptop slightly.
> Any ideas? I observed this with ipw2100 drivers on linux since they're
> available and with the ipw2200 driver since I've a laptop with this
> driver (~two weeks) ;-) 

Do you have other APs around? I'm wondering if the driver select other
strong signal APs.

Another try is to set a different sensitivity with (iwconfig sens xx).
The current roaming threshold is 8 (means start roaming if we detected 8
lost beacons) and disassociate threshold is 3 times of the roaming
threshold. Try to see if a bigger value makes it better for your case.


Thanks,
-yi

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.