Re: ipw2100 vs WPA
Cedric Blancher <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.drivers.ipw2100.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Cartel Securite |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Le dimanche 20 août 2006 à 15:28 +0100, Hamish a écrit : > > -Dwext ? > Hot damn! The generic one works... ;) > OK... probably a stupid question that's known by all here, but why does Linux > Wireless Extensions (Generic) work, when specifying ipw (WHich wpa_supplicant > is for ipw2100/ipw2200 drivers) explicitly (Or nothing) doesn't? Because people would like all drivers move to a unified 802.11 stack and rely on Wireless Extensions for everything, including WPA/WPA2, instead of each one relying one a specific, sometimes unstable, interface. As for documentation, I don't know. Intel drivers moved to Wext from quite a time now, it's been discussed on this mailing list. -- http://sid.rstack.org/ PGP KeyID: 157E98EE FingerPrint: FA62226DA9E72FA8AECAA240008B480E157E98EE >> Hi! I'm your friendly neighbourhood signature virus. >> Copy me to your signature file and help me spread! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642