Question to devs: ipw2200 w/ RADIOTAP/PROMISCUOUS
Axel Thimm <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.drivers.ipw2100.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, users are asking me whether ATrpms could enable some commented by default parts of the drivers. For ipw2200 it's about CONFIG_IPW2200_RADIOTAP and CONFIG_IPW2200_PROMISCUOUS. What is the reason for commenting them and not enabling by default? And if it's not due to some no-go issues (like stability/maturity of code) would the devs ack packagers to enable them? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ ipw2100-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipw2100-devel
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFTvm1QBVS1GOamfERAq0/AJ9B46Q/XbV30SbSrALr1c1A34MWrQCfZh8h J1AzgTHqDiwejWdT0aUZecI= =KtI8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----