Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] Runtime power management on ipw2100

Oliver Neukum <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.network,gmane.linux.power-management.general,gmane.linux.drivers.ipw2100.devel
Organization Novell
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Am Mittwoch, 31. Januar 2007 14:04 schrieb Pavel Machek:
> On Wed 2007-01-31 13:53:20, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 11:48 +0100, ext Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 31 January 2007 11:27, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 12:13:04PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > > Matthew Garrett <[email protected]> writes:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > PCI seems to require a delay of 10ms when sequencing from D3 to D0, 
> > > > > > which probably isn't acceptable latency for an "up" state.
> > > > > 
> > > > > It might be if the interface has been idle for some time
> > > > > (and the delay is not busy looping of course)
> > > > 
> > > > Hm. How would this interact with receiving packets?
> > > 
> > > The hardware will hopefully have support to wake itself up when that 
> > > happens.
> > 
> > Yes. Low power states without ability to respond to wakeup interrupts
> > would be broken behaviour generally.
> 
> Do you realy expect wifi to save significant ammount of power, while
> still listening for packets on wireless network?

It has a managed mode which gives each station a timeslot. Outside
those slots you could power down, if you can do it quickly.

	Regards
		Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.