Re: Mark IPW2100 as BROKEN: Fatal interrupt. Scheduling firmware restart.
Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]> Mon, 22 Sep 2008 01:05:55 +0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general,gmane.linux.network,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.drivers.ipw2100.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 02:02:03PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven ([email protected]) wrote: > > That allows to dump whatever number of warnings you want. The more we > > have, the louder will be customers scream. > > artificially increasing numbers isn't going to do that; it just shows > you're more interested in making a stink than in getting something > improved ;( As practice shows, I'm the only one who is interested in getting something improved, and Intel, as we see right now, is not interested in it at all, since you ask me not only decrease error verbosity, but also do not work towards fixing the bug by trying to understand where it lives. -- Evgeniy Polyakov -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html