Re: Mark IPW2100 as BROKEN: Fatal interrupt. Scheduling firmware restart.

Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]> Sun, 21 Sep 2008 14:14:51 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general,gmane.linux.network,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.drivers.ipw2100.devel
Organization Intel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 01:05:55 +0400
Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 02:02:03PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven
> ([email protected]) wrote:
> > > That allows to dump whatever number of warnings you want. The
> > > more we have, the louder will be customers scream.
> > 
> > artificially increasing numbers isn't going to do that; it just
> > shows you're more interested in making a stink than in getting
> > something improved ;(
> 
> As practice shows, I'm the only one who is interested in getting
> something improved, and Intel, as we see right now, is not interested
> in it at all, since you ask me not only decrease error verbosity, but
> also do not work towards fixing the bug by trying to understand where
> it lives.

I did no such thing and you know it.

I'm sorry, I'm not going to waste time on this if you keep acting
this dishonest; welcome to my mail filter...


-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html