Re: Mark IPW2100 as BROKEN: Fatal interrupt. Scheduling firmware restart.
Marcel Holtmann <holtmann-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/[email protected]> Mon, 22 Sep 2008 01:27:47 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general,gmane.linux.network,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.drivers.ipw2100.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1222039667.6782.125.camel@californication> |
Hi Evgeniy, > > > That allows to dump whatever number of warnings you want. The more we > > > have, the louder will be customers scream. > > > > artificially increasing numbers isn't going to do that; it just shows > > you're more interested in making a stink than in getting something > > improved ;( > > As practice shows, I'm the only one who is interested in getting > something improved, and Intel, as we see right now, is not interested in > it at all, since you ask me not only decrease error verbosity, but also > do not work towards fixing the bug by trying to understand where it > lives. as Arjan and Alan pointed out already, WARN_ON_ONCE is enough and I agree with them. Just to make this perfectly clear, this is with my community hat on. Please send a proper patch with a simple WARN_ON_ONCE and I am happy to sign off on it. Regards Marcel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html