RE: Caller ID not supported?

I'm glad to hear that caller ID is working...

I don't know if this modem has the required hardware.  I can tell you
every component that's on the board, but I do not have any 
documentation that was delivered with the modem.  On the other hand, 
I have gigabytes of documentation from the web, but I can't be positive 
what is applicable and/or accurate.

AT+VCID=1 produces an OK response, as does AT+VDR=1.  I don't consider
that a guarantee that the required hardware is there, but I'd like to
think it's at least a good sign.  The software is not blindly giving 
responses to everything; AT+FCLASS=8 produces ERROR, and
consistently, AT+FCLASS=? produces '0'.

Thanks for the information.

Rick



Steve Laverty wrote::
> 
> Caller ID has worked flawlessly for me for your application for over a 
> year now.  The only thing I can think of is that modems need to have 
> additional hardware to support on-hook caller ID.  Perhaps your modem is 
> not equipped.  Going into minicom and typing AT+VCID=1 has always worked 
> for me, in fact I combine that with AT+VDR=1 so that I know which 'line' 
> the call came in on.  It is worth noting that I beleive that AT+VCID=1 
> only produces a response when not in AT+FCLASS=8.  Not sure about 1 or 
> 1.0.  To be safe try it in 0.
> 
> Steve
> 
> Rick Matthews wrote:
> 
> >My weekend project was to bring up a network caller id sever using a
> >127a:1003 PCI modem from the spare parts bin and the hcfpcimodem
> >software (1.01lnxt04072900full_k2.4.20_28.8-1rh.i586 to be exact).
> >
> >Current status: The modem gives the proper responses during 
> >initialization but reports only the RINGs with no cid information.
> >
> >I went back through the archives and found:
> >	_Seven people have inquired about caller id.
> >	_Only two of the seven received responses.
> >	_Both were asked to run "hcfpciconfig --dumpdiag".
> >	_Both complied and submitted their dumpdiag data.
> >	_Neither received any additional assistance.
> >	_One of the two then paid for the full version and re-asked 
> >	 his cid question, but received no response.
> >
> >Shouldn't caller id be added to the limitations page?
> >
> >Rick
> >_______________________________________________
> >%(real_name)s mailing list
> >%(real_name)s@%(host_name)s
> >%(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> %(real_name)s mailing list
> %(real_name)s@%(host_name)s
> %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s
_______________________________________________
%(real_name)s mailing list
%(real_name)s@%(host_name)s
%(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s