Re: Semi-success with a "no name" modem
"Linuxant support (Jonathan)" <[email protected]> Wed, 22 Mar 2006 13:29:19 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.drivers.modem.hcf |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, it is possible that you specific modem requires different NVM parameters to have correct dial tone, busy and ring signal detection. You could try to use the modem under Windows to see if these features are correctly working. If it works correctly, please send to [email protected] the INF and CTY files of the Windows driver. You should also send a dumpdiag which can be generated by the 'hcfpciconfig --dumpdiag' command in a root shell. Regards, Jonathan Technical specialist / Linuxant www.linuxant.com [email protected] Andreas U. Trottmann wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 02:26:28PM -0500, Linuxant support (Jonathan) wrote: > > >>you could also try to use the 'AT &F X1' init. string to see if there is >>a difference. > > > Indeed it does! After AT&FX1, dialout works as expected! Thank > you very much! > > On the "incoming" side, there's a change as well. I was not able > to completely find out the conditions, but it appears that after > at least one outgoing call was made, incoming calls are > recognized and handled correctly. > > After configuring the "normal" ATX4, the behaviour is back to > what it was before. > > > Is there anything that can be tweaked to make it work with X4 as > well? > >