Re: WPA support

On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 07:12:00AM -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:
> Aw, common.   You can say more than that.   Is it under active 
> development, or on the roadmap?

OK fine, well I finally have time now and will resume work on it. I
noticed ajfa seems interested in it too. Right now we're waiting for a
reply to our patches to kernel.org tree. Once we get some replies we'll
then either fix our code or just tag up a new release -- 1.2. Either way
1.2 is going to be released soon. It won't have WPA or WDS completed
though :(

	Luis

> 
> 
> On May 25, 2004, at 7:01 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> 
> >On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 04:00:39PM +0900, Jongmin Kim wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I tried buf failed to use WPA by 3Com PCMCIA Card(3CRWE154G72) in 
> >>Linux Box
> >>
> >>I want WPA Supported PCMCIA Card that can use in Linux Box.
> >>
> >>And, if support WPA, wonder what work must do.
> >>
> >>Later, I want to embody this in StrongArm base board.
> >>
> >>I need your help.
> >>
> >>Have a nice day : )
> >>
> >
> >We haven't yet completed WPA support. Stay tuned though.
> >
> >-- 
> >GnuPG Key fingerprint = 113F B290 C6D2 0251 4D84  A34A 6ADD 4937 E20A 
> >525E
> >_______________________________________________
> >Prism54-users mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >http://prism54.org/mailman/listinfo/prism54-users

-- 
GnuPG Key fingerprint = 113F B290 C6D2 0251 4D84  A34A 6ADD 4937 E20A 525E

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAs2AXat1JN+IKUl4RAoZPAJ9IpnTrBiYW/DaIRkcjsONzzgBZ/wCcCuVk
4IfxwbzkWNegHva1mbh/y1U=
=8Or9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----