Re: eth0 & eth1 won't work at the same time
Andy Boff <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.drivers.prism54.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | University Of York |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sunday 11 July 2004 20:13, you wrote: > That might be the problem... > > eth0 ---> statically set to 135.7.32.121 (wired) > eth1 ---> statically set to 135.7.16.121 (wireless) > > Are these two address to close to each other? Not really. Like decimal numbers, IP addresses use characters to separate them for readability. For example, decimal may have "135,007,032,121". All the IP addresses are doing is using a "." instead of a "," and then they're cancelling leading zeros between the "."s (because the computer knows that the "." separates blocks of 3 numbers). They may be too close (although it's unlikely), or they may be too far apart. It's impossible to say without some more information about your network. The subnet mask determines whether 2 IP addresses can "see" each other. For example, a subnet mask of 255.255.255.0 requires that the first 3 blocks of numbers are the same. Could you possibly post the results of netstat -r for each situation, and it would probably also be helpful if you could post the subnet masks you're using, and any default gateways. Also, could you describe as best you can how your network is set up? Are you using a Wifi router, or are you just using a wifi access point? With the routing issue, your computer needs to know how to send packets to the outside world. The routing table is what it uses to decide. Thus, it sounds to me like the routing table isn't quite set up right when both interfaces are active. Possibly it's routing everything through your wired interface, when you were expecting it to send it through the wireless interface. > > Warrick > > --- Andy Boff <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sunday 11 July 2004 19:36, Warrick Lacey wrote: > > > Its like I can have eth0 (wired ethernet) or I can > > > have eth1 working (wireless ethernet) but not > > > > both. > > > > It could be a routing table issue. Could you > > possibly post a copy of the > > routing table for: > > > > - just eth0 up > > - just eth1 up > > - both eth0 and eth1 up > > > > (routing table can be obtained using "netstat -r" as > > root). > > > > At least then we could possibly eliminate routing > > issues. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Andy > > _______________________________________________ > > Prism54-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://prism54.org/mailman/listinfo/prism54-users > > ===== > "She might have fooled me, but she didn't fool my mother." > Norman Bates, "Psycho" > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail