Re: [V4l2-library] Messed up syscall return value

Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 07/29/2008 12:16 AM, Gregor Jasny wrote:
>> ioctl(3, VIDIOC_REQBUFS or VT_DISALLOCATE, 0x7fffbfda0060) = 2
>>
>> Huh? Something evils seems to be going on in V4L2 land.
>> I've spotted the following lines in videobuf-core.c:videobuf_reqbufs
>>
>>         req->count = retval;
>>
>>  done:
>>         mutex_unlock(&q->vb_lock);
>>         return retval;
>>
>> That would explain the retval '2'. It seems a retval = 0; statement is 
>> missing here for the success case.
>

Indeed, so iow I'm happy to conclude that thie is not a libv4l bug :)

Regards,

Hans


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/