Re: Osicom 123400-21 40port card

Jason Marshall <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.drivers.tulip.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> > which is a 4-port card with 4x 21140-AE,
> 
> That makes it an older board.

1996 is stamped on the board, so you're right on the money *8-)

> > and two Lattice PLSI2032 (???)
> 
> That's an FPGA part number.  I don't know what a FPGA would be doing on
> a four port NIC... do you see other transceiver chips?

Haha, beats me -- There are also four "SEEQ" NQ80C269633's, but I don't
know if they're what you're after.  At least there's four of those.

> The driver doesn't assign IRQs, the BIOS (or OS) does.

That's what I thought, but last time I installed a four-port card you
recommended I install the 0.93 version from your site.  I did that (which
was technically a downgrade, I believe), and bingo bango bongo, all the
ports magically appeared on the same IRQ, whereas with the newer version
of the driver, they were all different.  Same motherboard, BIOS, 4-port
card.  Only the driver was replaced.

Should I give the new 0.95 version a go?  

> Where/when did you pick up the 0.93 driver?  The standard one is 0.95.
> No matter...

I got it from your site quite some time ago now -- months, not years...

> Errrmmm, no.  The driver actually goes to a great deal of effort to
> reverse the common BIOS bug that incorrectly claims that the devices
> behind a bridge are on separate IRQs.  The driver finds the first port
> and copies the IRQ to the other ports.

This board lists its interfaces bass-ackward.  It never occured to me that
that might be an issue.

eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:00:BC:11:6B:6F  
          Interrupt:11 Base address:0x7000 
eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:00:BC:11:6B:6E  
          Interrupt:10 Base address:0x7080 
eth2      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:00:BC:11:6B:6D  
          Interrupt:7 Base address:0x7100 
eth3      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:00:BC:11:6B:6C  
          Interrupt:5 Base address:0x7180 

On the machine were all this stuff is working right, the MAC's are listed
in ascending order...  Should I try the -DREVERSE_PROBE_ORDER thing?

Thanks, Donald!

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
| Jason Marshall, [email protected]. Spots InterConnect, Inc. Calgary, AB |
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

_______________________________________________
tulip mailing list, [email protected]
To change to digest mode or unsubscribe visit
http://www.scyld.com/mailman/listinfo/tulip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.