Re: Osicom 123400-21 40port card
Jason Marshall <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.drivers.tulip.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> The problem is that the driver uses the missing EEPROM on ports 1-3 to > trigger a work-around for a common BIOS bug: the BIOS does not correctly > record which devices are using which IRQs. Okay... I confess that I'm not sure what that really means, but are you suggesting that putting the reverse-probe fix in place might do the trick? I won't wait for an answer, but I will let you know if that doesn't work, as I'll try it right now, once my partner in crime is finished dicking with it... > Have you tested all four ports? If they all work, you don't have the > bug. You caught me. I've assigned IP's to each port, but haven't even plugged them into the switch. My bad *8-) > That should work. > Routing is, however, beyond the scope of this list. Obviously, and I won't be asking any routing questions here -- that, at least, is something I have a firm grasp of. Just exlaining that using up four IRQ's instead of just one is counter to my intentions for this card. Thanks so much for your help, Donald -- it's amazing to think that there are still people out there claiming that the support for open-source stuff is lacking; this level of service would easily cost $10,000/yr from Sun or HP! Canadian dollars, but the bigger numbers look more impressive *8-) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- | Jason Marshall, [email protected]. Spots InterConnect, Inc. Calgary, AB | =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- _______________________________________________ tulip mailing list, [email protected] To change to digest mode or unsubscribe visit http://www.scyld.com/mailman/listinfo/tulip