Re: Tulip driver hangs detecting MAC
Donald Becker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.drivers.tulip.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Bernardo Reino wrote: > I have a Compaq Presario 17XL573 laptop, with a 'Conexant LANfinity' > network card (14f1/1803, rev 08). > > It works correctly using the netdrivers.tgz package from Donald > Becker (pci-scan.c v1.10 7/13/2002, and tulip.c v0.95b 8/2/2002), > using the 2.4.19 kernel version (compiled with gcc 2.95.3, like > the tulip module) but only when I start the computer from a power-off > state. ... > (I don't know why the BIOS doesn't enable the NIC, and I can't > seem to change that, but that doesn't seem to be a/the problem..) It's not a problem -- the pci-scan code activates the card. The Linux kernel didn't activate the card until recent versions. The message is there to indicate that pci-scan did a good thing. > The problem is that when I reboot Linux, or reboot from Windows 2000 > to Linux, the initialization hangs before displaying the MAC address, > so I get something like this: That's new. > eth0: Conexant LANfinity rev 8 at 0xd0877000, [ HERE IT LOCKS ] > > I have tried waiting for a reasonable amount of time (5 minutes..), > but it seems to stop responding to anything. All I can do is turn > off the computer (btw. I can use the kernel 'magic' sequence for > that, so the kernel is itself not being locked, but only the > driver initialization) Is > And 'tulip-diag' (v2.11 6/7/2002), with option '-a' shows: What does 'tulip-diag -ee' report in the situation where the driver would hang if loaded. (This likely means disabling the automatic driver loading.) > # tulip-diag -ee > EEPROM 256 words, 8 address bits. > Conexant EEPROM format is undocumented. > EEPROM contents (256 words): > 0x00: 1815 14f1 0780 0000 0000 1002 0042 0e11 > 0x08: 2814 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 c1af 0313 ... > I hope somebody can tell me what the problem might be, or how > to fix it. It appears that the Conexant EEPROM format is not > documented, That's not a problem. Reading the station address from the EEPROM is the only thing required. The address location is trivial to reverse-engineer once you can read the EEPROM. > I will try to add a few printk()'s here and there, to try to > locate the problem more precisely.. Almost all driver debugging is done with the 'printk' debugger... -- Donald Becker [email protected] Scyld Computing Corporation http://www.scyld.com 410 Severn Ave. Suite 210 Scyld Beowulf cluster system Annapolis MD 21403 410-990-9993 _______________________________________________ tulip mailing list, [email protected] To change to digest mode or unsubscribe visit http://www.scyld.com/mailman/listinfo/tulip