Parity error on 2nd Tulip card
Abe Ward Kabakoff <[email protected]> Fri, 7 Feb 2003 05:09:11 -0500 (EST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.drivers.tulip.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.LNX.4.44L-027.0302070448350.16150-100000@unix50.andrew.cmu.edu> |
Hello All, I am having problems with one of my two tulip cards (ADMtek AL985 Centaur-P both of them) in an IP-masqing machine. It is running kernel 2.4.20 and SuSE 7.2. On almost every packet on the connection to the internal network (hooked up to a 10baseT hub) the driver prints out a message that a system error occured (error number 0). I looked this up in the code, and it is a parity error. I then promptly commented out that part of the code so I wouldn't fill my logs. Oddly enough inspite of these errors the masqing seems to work fine, although I think there is an inordinate number of network collisions. Here is some basic info: (eth1 is the misbehaving card) Output from tulip-diag (no options): tulip-diag.c:v2.16 12/17/2002 Donald Becker ([email protected]) http://www.scyld.com/diag/index.html Index #1: Found a ADMtek AL985 Centaur-P adapter at 0xf800. Comet duplex is reported in the MII status registers. Transmit started, Receive started. The Rx process state is 'Waiting for packets'. The Tx process state is 'Idle'. The transmit threshold is 128. Comet MAC address registers 4a5a0400 ffff77cd Comet multicast filter 8000000040040000. Index #2: Found a ADMtek AL985 Centaur-P adapter at 0xf400. Comet duplex is reported in the MII status registers. Transmit started, Receive started. The Rx process state is 'Waiting for packets'. The Tx process state is 'Idle'. The transmit threshold is 128. Comet MAC address registers 6e5a0400 ffff59cf Comet multicast filter 8000000840000000. Use '-a' or '-aa' to show device registers, '-e' to show EEPROM contents, -ee for parsed contents, or '-m' or '-mm' to show MII management registers. - - - - - - - - - - - - - ifconfig eth0; ifconfig eth1 eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:04:5A:4A:CD:77 inet addr:24.166.200.214 Bcast:255.255.255.255 Mask:255.255.240.0 inet6 addr: fe80::204:5aff:fe4a:cd77/10 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST NOTRAILERS RUNNING MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:21171670 errors:1 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:2 TX packets:16604039 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:119520 txqueuelen:100 RX bytes:4199358735 (4004.8 Mb) TX bytes:3067991125 (2925.8 Mb) Interrupt:9 Base address:0x9c00 eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:04:5A:6E:CF:59 inet addr:192.168.0.1 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::204:5aff:fe6e:cf59/10 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:3808455 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:3934296 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:7657130 collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 RX bytes:2683709402 (2559.3 Mb) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) Interrupt:10 Base address:0xd800 - - - - - - - - - - cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 0: 82504235 XT-PIC timer 1: 112 XT-PIC keyboard 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade 9: 63770876 XT-PIC eth0 # no problems with this one 10: 15423065 XT-PIC eth1 # this one is misbehaving 14: 4048812 XT-PIC ide0 15: 4 XT-PIC ide1 NMI: 0 ERR: 0 - - - - - - - - - - Also, related to this I believe, the firewall prints such messages out, note the "OUT" field has no (printed) value: SuSE-FW-DROP-NEW-CONNECT IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:04:5a:4a:cd:77:00:05:74:f1:fc:54:08:00 SRC=24.59.147.238 DST=24.166.200.214 LEN=48 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=112 ID=13019 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=1167 DPT=17300 WINDOW=16384 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 OPT (020405B401010402) I hope this is enough info for someone to suggest something or know what else to ask for. _______________________________________________ tulip mailing list, [email protected] To change to digest mode or unsubscribe visit http://www.scyld.com/mailman/listinfo/tulip